Peer to Peer File Sharing Ruling


Peerto Peer File Sharing Ruling

Peerto Peer File Sharing Ruling

Thecase under review is the lawsuit against the peer-to-peer sharing bythe Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) regarding theuse of unauthorized material by LimeWire. The fact behind the lawsuitwas the use of software that allows file sharing by users in thepeer-to-peer sharing platform. The argument by the RIAA was thatabout 93% of files shared by LimeWire were through the unauthorizedsharing of copyrighted material (Kaminski, 2011). Another fact aboutthis case was that it was the first lawsuit targeting a softwaremanufacturer that allows such unique sharing.

Thecase was presented to the court to consider whether the owner of acopyrighted material can demand multiple claims on the same. Thequestion in the case was whether LimeWire had infringed copyrightprivileges of the owner’s copyrighted material. Another question inthe case was about how many infringements had the LimeWire made ofthe copyright material. In determining these questions, it wasdifficult for the court because LimeWire operates a connect-styleplatform that has multiple downloads that cannot be easily quantified(Kaminski, 2011). By using computer software, LimeWire enables usersto share files from one computer server.

Thecourt ruled it is illegal to trade using materials that are notcopyrighted. The court held that the copying such music files andmotion pictures through a peer-to-peer platform is illegal (Kaminski,2011). I agree with the ruling of the court. In an agreement, it isworth noting that any download of a file is a transaction thatchanges possession of a file from one person to another. Therefore,if the copyright owner has not approved the transaction, it is deemedto be illegal.


Kaminski,K. (2011). TheEnd of Peer-to-Peer File Sharing? RetrievedFrom,&lt 1, 2015

Related Posts

© All Right Reserved