Plagiarism, cheating and fabrication

PLAGIARISM, CHEATING AND FABRICATION 5

Plagiarism,cheating and fabrication

Nameof student

Nameof professor

Answersto thequestions

Questionone

Jenniferis guiltyof plagiarism.Shecopiesa largetextinto her paperjustbecauseshedoesnot haveenoughtimeto readandextractthemainideas.Shedeliberatelydoesthis,andshedoesnot quotethetextto showthatitcamefrom acertainsource.Shedoesnot givethedetailsof thepersonwhowrotethetext.Theproblemcould havebeensolvedby paraphrasingandin-text citations(Pecorari, 2013). Ifthere is plagiarism,thiswill be an academicdishonesty,anditcan attractpunishmentslike a zero scorein thetext.

Questiontwo

Philis guiltyof fabrication.Shedoesnot haveenoughsourcesin her bibliography,andshedecidesto putsomereferences.However,none of thesereferenceswasusedto writeher paper.Theinformationin her paperdoesnot relatein anywaywith thefabricated su0urces. Theideais a formof an inventionto enableher worklookpresentable.Sheis liableforfabrication.

Questionthree

Sueis guiltyof cheating.Shehas two papersto hand,butshedoesnot haveenoughtimeto writethem. She,therefore,decidesto useone paperforthetwo classes.Informationfrom one paperis supposedto be usedforits specificclass(Gunnarsson et al., 2014).Sue takesadvantageof thetopicsbecausetheyare almostsimilarandhandsin thesamepapers.Sheis liableforcheating.

ParttwoQuestionone

Whenwritingan academicpaper,versionone of thetwo textsgivenin thepaperrepresentsthebestformat.First,thetextis not a directimportationof wordsfrom theoriginaltext.Ithas a lotof paraphrasing that helpsto delivertheactualmessageto thereader(Macdonald, &amp Speight, 2013). Itis unlikein thesecondtextthat usestheexactwordsof theinitialauthor.Secondly,thetexthas in-text citationfortheborrowedwork.Itusesquotationsfordirectimportationof wordsandmentionstheauthorin theend.Thereisa referencefrom which thetextcomes,andthisis veryimperativein academicwriting.

Questiontwo

Betweenthetwo texts,thefirstversionstandsbetteras an academicpaper.Whencomparedwith thesecondversion,thefirstversiondoesnot usea lotof wordsfoundin theoriginaltext.Secondly,itintroducesthearticlefrom which theinformationcomes.Italsohighlights thepersonwhopresentstheargumentunlike in thesecondversion.

Questionthree

Inthisquestion,thesecondversionis betterfornewsreporting.Newsreportingdoesnot haveto includethedirectspeechof a persongivinginformation.Thereportmakesindirectspeechmorepractical.Thesecondversionalsoshowsthatan interviewtookplacewith thepersonmakingtheargument,andthismakestheinformationcredible.Amisrepresentationof thequote during theinterviewcan leadto a reactionby theinterviewee. Hecan claimthatthewordsuseddidnot comefrom him.Question4

Whengivinga briefto theadvertisingcompany,thesecondversionis muchbetterthan thefirstone. First,theinformationitgivesto thecompanysoundsoriginalbecauseithighlights thatthere is ampleevidence.Thereis no citation of the sourceUnlikein thefirstversion.Secondly,itgivesa clearanda strongstandthattheir candidatemust not be a victimof suchadvertising.To sum up their brief,itgivesthenegativeadvertisingcompanya hintof theopponent’sweakness.Thecompanycan buildup on thisto attacktheopponent.Afabricationof thisbriefinto anotheronewould resultin a situationwherethecandidatein questionhas not committedthementionedallegations.Itcould alsoconfusethegenderof thecandidatebecausetheoneusedhereis a femaleandin theothersituation,itcould be a male.

References

Gunnarsson,J., Kulesza, W. J., &amp Pettersson, A. (2014). Teachinginternationalstudentshowto avoidplagiarism:librariansandfacultyin collaboration. TheJournal of Academic Librarianship,40(3), 413-417.

Macdonald,S., &amp Speight-Burton, E. (2013). LibGuides: Learningin a Changing World-The Essay. Academicintegrity-avoiding Plagiarism. Pearson: New York.

Pecorari,D. (2013). Teachingto Avoid Plagiarism.McGraw-Hill Education (UK).

Related Posts

© All Right Reserved